|
Derivative vapor generation
atomic absorption spectrometry and its application in trace analysis
Sun
Hanwen, Ai Lianfeng Li Liqing
(College of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Hebei University, Key Laboratory of
Analytical Science and Technology of Hebei Province, Baoding 071002, China)
Received Jan. 18, 2006.
Abstract Derivative
molecular spectrophotometry is based on the determination of variation rate of signal
intensity with wavelength (dI/dl). A new derivative technique based on the determination of
variation rate of signal intensity with time (dA/dt) has been developed for vapor
generation atomic absorption spectrometry. The models of conventional signal and the
equations of derivative signal are described for cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry
(CVAAS) and hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (HGAAS). The principle and
performance of the vapor generation atomic absorption spectrometry using derivative signal
processing are evaluated. The intensity of derivative signal is directly related to the
concentration of analysis with a good linearity. In comparison with conventional vapor
generation atomic absorption spectrometry, the method has higher sensitivity and lower
detection limit. The applications of the derivative vapor generation atomic absorption
spectrometry in trace analysis are reviewed.
Keywords Vapor generation;Atomic absorption spectrometry;Signal models;Derivative measurement principle;Trace analysis
1 INTRODUCTION
Derivative molecular spectrophotometry is
based on the determination of variation rate of signal intensity with wavelength (dI/dl). Bosch et al.
reported all the methods that were currently available to researchers for utilizing
derivative ultraviolet/visible absorption spectrophotometry and their analytical
applications until 1993.[1] The recent publications were reviewed on
theoretical aspect of derivative spectrometry and its use in chemical analysis,
pharmaceutical analysis, food analysis, clinical analysis and other field of applications
published since 1994.[2] The spectrum obtained with derivative
spectrophotometry offers a convenient solution to a number of well-known analytical
problems,such as the
resolution of multi-component systems,removal of sample turbidity,matrix background and enhancement of spectral details.
Atomic absorption
spectrometry is an accepted and widely used method for the determinations of micro
elements in a great variety of samples. But its sensitivity could not meet the demands of
trace and ultra-trace analysis for some sample. Analysts have studied on how to enhance
the sensitivity of flame atomic absorption spectrometry by various ways, and most of the
studies focus on the improvement and application of preconcentration technique by using
chemical and physical methods. All of the reported methods are based on the measurement of
signal intensity and there is no any breakthrough in the measurement technique. A new
derivative technique based on determination of variation rate of signal intensity with
time (dA/dt) has been developed by Sun's group for
flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS).[3] This derivative technique is
different from the derivative molecular spectrophotometry based on the determination of
variation rate of signal intensity with wavelength (dA/dl). The sensitivity of Cu, Mn,
Fe, Zn, Cd and Pb for the derivative flame atomic absorption spectrometry (D-FAAS) can be
remarkably improved at 2mVmin-1with 50 times higher as compared with FAAS.[4]
The applications of the derivative flame atomic absorption spectrometry in trace analysis
have been reviewed.[5]
Application of hydride generation for atomic spectrometry is
the most efficient method for the determination of hydride-forming elements. Many methods
coupled with hydride generation, such as HGAAS, HGAES, HGICP and HG-MS, are effective, but
for an accurate determination of trace element in water, pre-concentration is generally
required. The proposed derivative technique has been applied to cold vapor atomic
absorption spectrometry (CVAAS) and hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry
(HGAAS) for the determinations of trace elements in biological and environmental sample.[6-8]
The purpose of this paper is to review the methodology and application of the
derivative vapor generation atomic absorption spectrometry.
2 SIGNAL MODEL
2.1 Signal model for HGAAS
The signals of conventional and derivative vapor generation atomic absorption
spectrometry are shown in Fig.1. [9]

Fig.1 The conventional (A) and derivative signals (B) for vapor generation atomic absorption spectrometry
A
conventional signal for CVAAS and HGAAS is similar to a pulse signal to be used for
analysis. A derivative signal for CVAAS and HGAAS consists of an up-peak and a down-peak
connected with the end and the head.
The model of conventional signal for HGAAS was given as follows:[9-11]
for up-side: Au= A0·[ 1-exp(-ta /b)]
for down-side: Ad = A0· exp(-tc/d)
Where a, b, c and d for any element are constant in a
wide range of concentration. It was given in Table 1.
Table 1 The values of a,
b, c and d for studied elements
Element |
a |
b |
c |
d |
Bi |
1.80 |
8.08 |
1.01 |
26.74 |
As |
2.0 |
2.16 |
1.45 |
17.00 |
Se |
1.10 |
6.32 |
1.18 |
20.66 |
Sb |
1.62 |
7.66 |
1.02 |
24.68 |
Te |
1.98 |
6.44 |
1.02 |
24.68 |
Sn |
1.01 |
7.14 |
1.58 |
24.56 |
Pb |
1.62 |
6.99 |
1.01 |
22.79 |
The variation of the derivative signal
intensity with time for derivative HGAAS was obtained by derivativing the model to time,
respectively.
for up-side:dAu/dt=a·b-1
A0··ta-1·exp(-ta /b)
for down-side:dAd/dt=c·d-1·A0·tc-1·exp(-tc
/d)
2.2 Signal model for CVAAS
Generation of Hg vapor is based on
reaction of Hg2+ with NaBH4.The change rate of mercury quantity at
the inlet of absorption cell can be expressed as the difference of the rate of
introduction n1(t) and that of dissipation n2(t), it
was expressed as dnA/dt = n1(t) - n2 (t).The redox
reaction of generation of mercury vapor could be considered as a first-order reaction if
the acidity of medium was a constant and the quantity of potassium tetrahydroborate was
excessive. Then the introducing rate of mercury vapor at any time can be expressed by n1(t)
= k2× k1× n0× exp(k1t) , where k1 is
the reaction rate constant, n0 is the initial quantity of mercury ion(II), and
k2 is a proportion factor which is related to volume of test solution and
length of conduit. The dissipation rate of mercury vapor from the cell at any time can be
given by n2(t) = k3 × (FD/πr2 )× nA, where k3 is a
proportion factor, F is the flow rate of carrier gas , r is the radius of absorption cell
, and D is the diffusion coefficient of mercury atom, nA is the
quantity of mercury vapor in the place of inlet at any time. Then dnA /dt
was given by [6]
dnA/dt = k2 k1 n0 exp(k1t)﹣k3 (FD/πr2
) nA
The quantity of mercury vapor at different points in the cell can be given by n = nA
(l – x / L), where L is the length
of the absorption cell and x is diffusion distance of mercury vapor. The total
quantity of mercury vapor has been obtained, then the model of absorbance signal was given
by

The equation for the derivative CVAAS has been obtained by derivativing the model to
time.

3 PRINCIPLE AND PERFORMANCE
3.1 Derivative analysis principle
The laboratory-made derivative measurement system consists of a
magnification and a differential unit. [8] The circuit diagram of derivative
measurement equipment is shown in Fig.2.
An output signal has a rigorous derivative relation with the input
ones. The output signal of the system will keep in base-line when the variation of the
input signal is zero, and when the variation of the input signal is not zero, there is a
corresponding polar output which is in direct relation to the variation of the input
signal. The derivative measurement equipment was connected between an atomic absorption
spectrometer and a double-pen recorder, as shown in Fig.3. The derivative and conventional
signals were recorded simultaneously with the double-pen recorder.

Fig.2 The circuit diagram of
derivative measurement equipment

Fig.3 Derivative atomic absorption spectrometric system
A: Lamp-house, B: Atomizer, C: Hydride generation equipment, D: Spectrophotometer, E:
derivative measurement equipment, F: Recorder
Based on
differential principle, the intensity of output signal of the derivative measurement
system was expressed as D = -m·B·RC·dA/dt, where m is
magnification multiple of magnification unit, RC is time constant of differential
unit, B is sensitivity of differential unit. The height of up-peak and down-peak of
derivative signal are expressed as Du and Dd, respectively.
The total height of derivative signal is expressed as D, where D= Du + Dd.
The equations for up-peak and down-peak of derivative signal were obtained.[8]
The total height of the up-peak and down-peak is expressed
as: [6-8]
for D-HGAAS: 
for D-CVAAS: 
For the derivative system, both RC and m
are a constant. As A0=k× c for HGAAS, and CVAAS used peak time as
measurement time, the intensity of derivative signal can be expressed as D =K× B× c.
When derivative measurement sensitivity (B) was selected, the intensity of
derivative signal is directly related to the concentration of analyte. It provided
theoretical principle for derivative atomic absorption spectrometry.
3.2 Analytical performance
The curve drawn based on the mathematical model is in good agreement with the signal
measured experimentally. The test result showed that the proposed derivative atomic
absorption spectrometry has a good linearity for the determination of trace and
ultra-trace element, as shown in Table 2. The sensitivities for the derivative atomic
absorption spectrometry can be remarkably improved at 2mVmin-1with 16-72 times
higher as compared with vapor generation atomic absorption spectrometry, as shown in Table
3, along with the relative standard deviation range at 20, 10, 5 and 2 mV min-1.
The detection limits of derivative vapour generation atomic absorption spectrometry and
derivative spectrophotometry(DS) for the determinations of some elements are given in
Table 4. In comparison with derivative spectrophotometry, the derivative vapour generation
atomic absorption spectrometry has higher sensitivity and lower detection limit, but it
was used only to the determination of single metal element.
Table 2 Regression equations
and correlation coefficients [7]
Element |
Sensitivity
range (mV min-1) |
Regression equation*
A= a·C ± b |
Linear range
(mg L-1) |
Correlation
coefficient |
As |
20 |
A=0.1700 C - 0.00002 |
0-100 |
0.9998 |
|
10 |
A=0.3450 C + 0.00002 |
0-100 |
0.9994 |
|
5 |
A=0.9293 C + 0.00004 |
0-100 |
0.9991 |
|
2 |
A=1.9860 C + 0.00006 |
0-100 |
0.9959 |
Sb |
10 |
A=0.1924 C + 0.00005 |
0-100 |
0.9996 |
|
2 |
A=1.1160 C - 0.00005 |
0-80 |
0.9986 |
Bi |
10 |
A=0.3414 C - 0.0004 |
0-100 |
0.9997 |
|
2 |
A=1.8180 C + 0.0001 |
0-80 |
0.9998 |
Sn |
10 |
A=0.1441 C -0.0005 |
0-100 |
0.9992 |
|
2 |
A=0.6693 C + 0.0002 |
0-80 |
0.9989 |
Pb |
10 |
A=0.0487 C +0.00002 |
0-150 |
0.9988 |
|
2 |
A=0.2405 C +0.00001 |
0-150 |
0.9985 |
Te |
10 |
A =0.0198 C +0.0002 |
0-200 |
0.9981 |
Hg |
2
|
A=0.024 m -0.0002 |
1.8-35.0 ng |
0.9968 |
* A: derivative absorbance, C: mg L-1 m: mass, ng
Table 3 Improved fold of
sensitivity and detection limit and relative standard deviation
Element |
Sensitivity
range (mV min-1) |
Increased sensitivity (Fold)
|
Improved detection limit (Fold) |
RSD(%) |
Pb |
2 |
26 |
14 |
3.8 ~ 4.8 |
Se |
2 |
34 |
16 |
2.4 ~ 4.2 |
Te |
2 |
52 |
37 |
4.2 ~ 5.3 |
As |
2 |
36 |
13 |
1.7 ~ 4.8 |
Bi |
2 |
47 |
8.6 |
2.6 ~ 4.8 |
Sn |
5 |
16 |
12 |
2.2 ~ 5.2 |
Sb |
2 |
28 |
8.9 |
2.1 ~ 4.2 |
Hg |
2 |
72 |
24.5 |
2.8 |
Table 4 Comparison of detection limits
between derivative vapour generation atomic absorption spectrometry and derivative
spectrophotometry(DS)
Method |
Order |
Analyte |
Sample |
Linear range
(mg L-1) |
Detection limit(mg L-1) |
Ref. |
DS |
second |
Hg |
Waste water |
18-104 |
18 |
[12] |
DS |
First |
Se |
Tea |
0-1000 |
0.13 |
[13]
|
DS |
First |
Se |
Water, blood, Hair |
0-250 (ng) |
1.5 (ng) |
[14]
|
DS |
First |
Cd, Hg |
Sythetical sample |
420-9200 |
34, 34 |
[15] |
DS |
First |
Pb, Cd, Hg |
Sythetical sample |
0-2, 0-40, 9-200 |
4, 2, 10 |
[16]
|
DCVAAS |
First |
Hg |
Cosmetic sample |
1.8-35.0 (ng) |
155 (pg) |
[17]
|
DHGAAS |
First |
Pb |
waters |
0-150 |
0.096 |
[10]
|
DHGAAS |
First |
Te |
Urine |
0-200 |
0.26 |
[18]
|
DHGAAS |
First |
Se |
Urine |
0-150 |
0.074 |
[19]
|
4 APPLICATIONS
Tellurium is a poisonous element in living biological systems, it can
be accumulated in kidney, heart, liver and spleen, and induce the degeneracy of liver and
kidney in excess of 0.002 g kg-1. [20] The content of tellurium in kidney,
liver and muscle is 0.07, 0.014 and 0.017 mg kg-1, respectively.[21] In
view of the extremely low concentration in biological samples, it is necessary to develop
sensitive, precise and accurate analytical methods for tellurium determination in
biological specimens. Kobayashi and Imaizumi determined tellurium in urine by graphite
furnace atomic absorption spectrometry after solvent extraction and hydride generation
atomic absorption spectrometry.[22,23] Siddik and Newsman published an
electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (EAAS) method using platinum as a modifier
for tellurium determination in urine, plasma and tissues.[24] Because of the
volatile nature of tellurium, a suitable chemical modifier should be selected when using
EAAS. A new method has been developed for the determination of tellurium in urine by
hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry with derivative signal processing
(D-HGAAS).[18] Urine samples of 100 ml each were digested in the beakers on an
electric hot-plate with the consecutive addition of 20 ml of concentrated HNO3
and 10 ml of HClO4. The samples were digested for about 1 h until the
appearance of white crystals, then the excess of HNO3 was removed by heating.
The beaker was removed and cooled down. Residues were dissolved with 10 ml of 1% HNO3
and diluted to 100 ml with sub-boiling distilled water for analysis. The proposed method
had been applied to the determination of tellurium in urine samples from a small
population of normal individuals with a recovery range of 89-98%. The characteristic concentration (gives a derivative
absorbance of 0.0044) and the detection limit (3s) for tellurium were 0.042 and 0.26mg L-1,
respectively, 52 and 26 times better than those of conventional HGAAS. The precision of
this method, expressed as RSD, was in the range of 3.5-5.1%
for samples of 0.64-1.82mg L-1.
The recommended daily dietary allowances of selenium for woman and men
are 55 mg and 70 mg per body, respectively.[25] But at higher concentrations
selenium is toxic. Because of the biological importance of selenium in living biological
systems, the hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry was used for the
determination of selenium in serum with detection limit of 0.40mg/L and RSD of 2126%-3176%,[26] and in urine with detection limits of five
selenium compounds were between 3 and 8 mg L-1, and the relative standard
deviation of <7% at 100 mg L-1Se.[27] Derivative hydride
generation atomic absorption spectrometry has been developed for the determination of
selenium in urine,[19] using sample treatment procedure described in
literature.[18] The characteristic concentration and the detection limit (3s) were 0.014 and 0.0074mg L.-1. The
sensitivities were improved by 3.6, 6.6, 13.1, and 51.0 fold, and the detection limits
were improved 2.2, 3.0, 5.3, 21 times beyond those of HGAAS at 20, 10, 5 and 2 mVmin-1
sensitivity setting, respectively. The derivative HGAAS has a good precision with
RSD of 2.2-2.4%.
Low level mercury determination and the evaluation of mercury pollution
have received great attention owing to its high toxicity and pollution. Because of its
simplicity, high sensitivity and relative freedom from interferences, cold vapour atomic
absorption spectrometry(CVAAS) has generally been used for the determination of mercury in
various samples. Some methods for the determination of mercury have been developed using a
combination of cold vapour generation, and trapping in a porous gold-plated graphite
mini-tube, [28] a gold-coated[29,30] or a platinum-lined graphite
tube,[31] followed by atomic absorption spectrometric detection. Flow injection
CVAAS was used to determine Hg in food with detection limit of 1.2mg/ kg and RSD of 4.7-8.4 %.[32]
A cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry with derivative signal
processing has been developed for the determination of total mercury.[17, 33]
Standard reference materials and cosmetic samples were deposited in PTFE pressure
digestion vessels for the procedure described below. 1 g of cosmetic sample or 2 g of
standard reference material sample was weighed accurately in the PTFE container and mixed
with 3 ml of concentrated nitric acid and 0.5 ml of concentrated perchloric acid. The
vessels were then covered with PTFE covers and put aside overnight. The vessels were
placed in stainless steel bombs, which were sealed tightly with a screw closure to avoid
gas leakage, and placed in an oven. The oven temperature was raised to 170ºC over 0.5 h and kept at this temperature for 7 h. The bombs were
taken out of the oven and cooled to room temperature. The PTFE vessels were taken out of
the stainless steel bombs and the covers were removed. The vessels were heated on a hot
plate at 100-110ºC and the solutions were
evaporated to about half of their initial volume. After cooling to room temperature, the
solutions were transferred to a 25 ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with 0.2
mol L-1 hydrochloric acid. The conventional and derivative signals of mercury
atoms were recorded with the doublepen recorder. The sensitivity and detection limits of
derivative CVAAS were 192 and 155 pg, respectively, 72 and 24.5 times better than those of
conventional CVAAS. Total mercury in standard reference materials, mussel (GBW08571) and
peach leaf (GBW08501) was determined by the proposed method, and the obtained values were
consistent with the reference values. The proposed method had been applied to determine
total mercury in skin lotion, astringent lotion, massage cream, cream E-C, and washing
milk samples with a recovery range of 92-102%and RSD of 2.8%.
The determination of trace elements has received increasing attention
in environmental pollution studies. In particular, there is an increasing need for a
simple, sensitive and accurate method for determining sub-parts-per-billion levels of
elements in environmental waters. Elements forming covalent hydrides such as antimony,
arsenic, bismuth,selenium, tellurium,tin, lead,etc., are often determined after hydride
generation by atomization of the hydride and measurement by atomic absorption
spectrometry. But for an accurate determination of trace element in waters,
pre-concentration is generally required. A hydride generation atomic absorption
spectrometry under sub-atmospheric pressure was described for determination of Sb, As, Bi
, Se ,Te and Sn, with the sensitivities of 290,80, 90, 73, 140 and 110pg, and detection
limits of 610, 100, 50, 60, 26 and 200pg, respectively.[34] A continuous flow
injection hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry was described for
determination of major antimony species in seawater using pre-concentration techniques.
After continuous flow injection hydride generation and collection onto a graphite tube
coated with iridium, antimony was determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption
spectrometry. The low detection limits were about 5 ng L-1 for Sb(III) and 10
ng L-1 for Sb(V) for 2.5 ml seawater samples.[35]
The derivative hydride generation atomic absorption
spectrometry with signal processing had been developed for the direct determination of
trace and ultra-trace level of As, Sb, Bi, and Sn in water samples.[11, 36, 37]
The effects of atomization temperature, argon flow rate, acidity and concentration of KBH4
and KI were investigated and analytical conditions were optimized. The sensitivities for
arsenic and antimony were increased 36.4 and 27.6 times better than those of HGAAS. For a
2 mV min–1, sensitivity range setting,
the characteristic concentration was 0.003mg L–1 for arsenic
and 0.004 mg L–1 for antimony, and the detection limits (3s) were 0.015 mg L–1 for arsenic and 0.020 mg L–1 for
antimony. The proposed method was applied to the determination of arsenic and antimony in
tap water, lake water and mineral water samples with recoveries of 93–110% and RSD of 3.0–5.0%.[11]
The proposed method has been applied to the determination of bismuth and tin in tap water,
lake water, well water and mineral water with recovery of 100% and 95.4% for bismuth and
tin, respectively, and RSD of 3.0-5.0%[36]. The calibration curves were linear in the
range of 0-100ng·ml-1 for Bi and 0-80ng·ml-1 for Sn
with correlation coefficients of 0.9989 to 0.9999. For a 2 mV min-1 sensitivity
range setting, the characteristic concentration was 0.003 mg·L-1 for bismuth and
0.004mg·L-1 for tin, and the detection limit (3s) was 0.012mg·L-1
for bismuth and 0.010 mg·L-1 for tin, respectively. The
sensitivities were increased by 42- and 31-fold and detection limits were improved by
10-fold for Bi and Sn when using sensitivity range of 2 mV min-1, respectively,
as compared to HGAAS. Used boracic acid as the reaction medium, the sensitivity for tin
was increased 43 times better than those of HGAAS.[37] The relative standard
deviation of 7 replicate determinations of tin in water samples at 0.08-0.72mg·L-1 was
3.9% to 4.7%. A new DHGAAS method was applied to the determination of traces of lead in
waters.[10] The detection limit and sensitivity of the proposed method were 26
times and 8.8 times better, respectively, than those of conventional hydride-generation
atomic absorption spectrometry. The characteristic concentration (for a derivative
absorbance of 0.0044) and detection limit (3s) for lead were 0.017 and 0.096 ng ml–1, respectively, for a 2 mV min–1 sensitivity range setting. The recovery range was 92.5-103%.
Lead poisoning has received considerable attention in recent years
because of its high toxicity. The prolonged intake of even low concentration of lead can
cause serious toxic effects. It is important to develop sensitive method for determination
of trace lead in food and biological sample. GFAAS is the most efficient method for the
determination of lead traces with the disadvantage of higher cost and greater
susceptibility to chemical interferences. HGAAS has been proved an extremely useful
method. A combination method of microwave assisted digestion-plumbane generation atomic
absorption spectrometry for the determination of lead in foodstuff s was described..
Sensitivity of the method was 0. 065mg L-1, detection limit was 0.070 mg L-1, and RSD was
better than 3 % with average recovery of 97 %.[38] A method of hydride
generation - atomic absorption spectrometry was described for the determination of trace
amounts of lead in salt and salt products with detection limit of 0.025 mg kg-1
Pb.[39] However, the conditions for lead hydride generation are critical and
the sensitivity is bad compared with that for other hydride-forming elements.
A new method is developed for the determination of trace level of lead
in seasoning by derivative hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry.[40]
At temperature of 900ºC, carrier gas flow rate of
600 ml min-1, medium acidy of 1.0% H2SO4 were selected
with the maximum derivative absorbance. The effect of different oxidants on hydride
generation was examined. The derivative absorbance was zero without oxidant and increased
after addition of a kind of oxidant. The derivative absorbance value changed unmistakably
with the concentration of KCr2O7 and H2O2 without
reaching a plateau. The derivative absorbance increased substantially after addition of K3Fe(CN)6
and became constant when the concentration of K3Fe(CN)6 was
higher than 0.5%. 1% K3Fe(CN)6 and a 5 ml of solution volume was
chosen for hydride generation. The derivative absorbance measured at 20, 10 and 5 mV min-1
with a 5 mg L-1
of lead solution were 0.1313, 0.2690 and 0.4706, respectively, and 0.4913 with a 2 mg L-1 of lead solution at 2
mV min-1. The detection limit and sensitivity for the proposed method were
improved by 26 times and 8.8 times than those of HGAAS,respectively. The detection limit (3s) of the proposed method for lead in real sample was 0.96 ng L-1
for taking 5.0g sample at a 2 mVmin-1 sensitivity range setting. The method was
applied to the determination of lead in seasoning samples, such as monosodium, glutamate,
white sugar, table salt and vinegar. The recoveries of spiked Pb from real samples are in
the range of 90.8-107% for real samples.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors express thanks to the Natural Science Foundation of
Hebei Province and the Specialized Research Funds of China Education Ministry for much
support to the studied subjects (No.203110) ,No.20050075003).
REFERENCES
[1] Ojeda C. Bosch, Rojas F.
Sanchez, Pavon J. M et al., Talanta, 1995, 42, 1195.
[2] EL-SAYED A. A Y, EL-SALEM N A. Anal. Sci., 2005, 21, 595.
[3] Yan Z, Sun H W, Zhang J S. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 1994, 14(5), 63.
[4] Wang W X, Sun H W. Physics Test and Chemical Analysis (Part B: Chemical Analysis),
2001, 37(1), 27.
[5]Sun H W,Li L
Q. Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, 2005, 2, (4): 268.
[6] Sun H W. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2003, 23, 386.
[7] Sun H W. Atomic spectroscopy and trace Analysis,Hebei University Pres, Baoding, 2001.
[8] Sun H W. Atomic spectrometry, High education Pres, Beijing, 2002.
[9] Sun H W. Journal of Hebei University, 2001, 21(3), 256.
[10] Sun H W, Ha J. Sun J M et al., Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem., 2001, 371, 1154.
[11] Sun H W, Ha J, Sun J M et al., Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2002, 374, 526.
[12] Yi J H, Chen T S. Environmental Monitoring in China, 1998, 14 (6), 30.
[13] Hu Y S, Su W Z. Journal of analytical Chemistry, 1996, 24, 371.
[14]Zhao Z H, Tian D H, Quan W Z. Environ. Sci., 1995, 16(4), 54
[15] Hashem Elham Y. Spectrochim. Acta, A 2002, 58, 1401.
[16]Chen Z G, Chen Y. Chinese Journal of analytical Chemistry, 1999, 27, 862.
[17] Zhang D Q, Yang L L, Sun H W. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1999, 395, 173.
[18] Ha J, Sun H W, Sun J. M et al., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2001, 448, 145.
[19] Sun H W, Zhang D Q, Ha J et al., Anal. Sci., 2002, 18, 603.
[20] Chai Z F. Environ. Sci., 1978, 3, 47.
[21] Chai Z F, Zhu H M. Introduction to Trace Element Chemistry, Atomic Energy Press,
Peking, China, 1994, p. 201.
[22] Kobayashi R, Imaizumi K. Anal. Sci., 1991, 6, 83.
[23] Kobayashi R, Imaizumi K. Anal. Sci., 1991, 7, 447.
[24] Stiddik Z H, Newman R A. Anal. Biochem., 1988, 172, 190.
[25] Lewande O. Am. Diet. Assoc., 1991, 91, 1572.
[26]Jiang D Z, Li y L, Hu Y H. Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology, 2005; 15,
563.
[27] Gomez M M, Gasparic T, Plascios M A et al., Anal. Chim. Acta, 1998, 374, 241.
[28] Siemer D D, Hageman L. Anal. Chem.. 1980, 52, 105.
[29] Lee S H, Jung K H, Lee D S. Talanta, 1989, 36, 999.
[30] Hladky Z, Risova J, Fisera M. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1990, 5, 691.
[31] Baxter D C, Frech W. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1989, 225, 175.
[32]Zhou T. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2005, 32, 790.
[33] Zhang D Q, Yang L L, Sun H W. Achievement and Challenge of Analytical Chemistry,Southwest Normal School Press,
Congqing, 2000.
[34] Zhang B G, Wang Y, Wang X S et al., Talanta, 1995, 42, 1095.
[35] Cabon J Y, Madec C L. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004, 504, 209.
[36] Sun H W, Ha J, Sun J M. Chemical Journal on Internet, 2003,
5(3), 26.
[37] Sun H W, Liang S X, Ha J et al., Chemical Journal on Internet,
2003, 5(3), 23.
[38] Xie L H. Physics Test and Chemical Analysis (Part B: Chemical Analysis) 2005, 41(5),
334.
[39] Song J Q. Physics Test and Chemical Analysis (Part B: Chemical
Analysis) 2004, 40 (3), 172.
[40] Liang S X, Ha J, Sun H W et al.,Chem. Analysis, 2003, 48, 723.
导数蒸气发生原子吸收光谱法及其在痕量分析中的应用
孙汉文 艾连峰 李丽请
(河北大学化学与环境科学学院,河北省分析科学技术重点实验室,071002,
保定)
摘要
导数分子光谱法是基于测量信号强度随波长的变化率。由作者提出的一种新型的导数蒸气发生原子吸收法是基于测量信号强度随时间的变化率。本文介绍了冷蒸气原子吸收和氢化物原子吸收常规信号模型及其导数信号方程。评价了导数蒸气发生原子吸收光谱法的原理和特性。导数信号强度与分析物浓度之间呈良好的线性关系。与导数分子光谱法及常规蒸气发生原子吸收光谱法相比,导数蒸气发生原子吸收光谱法具有较高的灵敏度和较低的检出限。综述了导数蒸气发生原子吸收光谱法在痕量分析中的应用。
关键词
氢化物,原子吸收光谱,信号模型,导数分析原理,痕量分析
|